tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post9060307065412727810..comments2023-12-31T14:37:54.685+11:00Comments on Global Warming Watch: 90% of RW think tanks push climate change denialWadardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-5242001786809703242008-06-17T17:34:00.000+10:002008-06-17T17:34:00.000+10:00LOL !!!!What does the way that I see myself have t...LOL !!!!<BR/><BR/>What does the way that I see myself have to do with anything? In any case I actually have a very healthy self image and I am not fazed by your insults and ad hominem arguments.<BR/><BR/>Having got the better of you here I will consider your arguments in other threads and see if you can do better there.<BR/>Cheers<BR/>IainAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-49409081069799788172008-06-17T09:21:00.000+10:002008-06-17T09:21:00.000+10:00You are the one who chose to think you were being ...You are the one who chose to think you were being treated like a dog, with no cause to. <BR/><BR/>I pointed out that other things get trained too, like minds, and now you are accusing me of being patronising.<BR/><BR/>I am sorry, I don't think you have a healthy enough self-image for me to conduct a constructive debate with you.<BR/><BR/>I am going to have to stop it here. Thanks anyway.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-7732249457697039742008-06-16T06:10:00.000+10:002008-06-16T06:10:00.000+10:00Hi Ian,Training is not just for dogs. You can trai...<EM>Hi Ian,</EM><BR/><BR/><EM>Training is not just for dogs. You can train your mind, too.</EM><BR/><BR/>Firstly my name is spelt <STRONG>IAIN not Ian </STRONG>secondly don't be so patronising it is very rude and no way to conduct debate.<BR/><BR/><STRONG><EM>Firstly is the global temperature actually rising?</EM></STRONG><BR/><BR/><EM>.2 degrees C per decade </EM><BR/><BR/><STRONG>Besides the Iain Hallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15912470020966769814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-14721415123630079282008-06-13T03:30:00.000+10:002008-06-13T03:30:00.000+10:00Do you Support or Oppose the position that man is ...Do you Support or Oppose the position that man is significantly responsible for Global Warming or believe it is a natural planetary cycle? Toss your brick to your elected offical at <A HREF="http://www.bricktoss.com/showissue.php?issueid=42" REL="nofollow">bricktoss.com</A>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-53980565563411732632008-06-12T23:14:00.000+10:002008-06-12T23:14:00.000+10:00Hi Ian, Training is not just for dogs. You can tra...Hi Ian, <BR/><BR/>Training is not just for dogs. You can train your mind, too.<BR/><BR/><I>Firstly is the global temperature actually rising?</I><BR/><BR/>.2 degrees C per decade <BR/><BR/><I>Do you have enough accurate data to know what the climate was in the past?</I><BR/><BR/>Sure. Heaps. Proxies like tree-rings, ice-core samples, past sea level rises. You would have seen this stuff in Gore's Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-85566907998797885092008-06-11T09:58:00.000+10:002008-06-11T09:58:00.000+10:00AGW (as a body of scientific literature) is a scie...<EM>AGW (as a body of scientific literature) is a science. You can only be one-eyed about it.</EM><BR/>Err No AGW (anthropogenic Global warming ) is a theory which is claimed to be scientific even though it cannot be tested by the <A HREF="http://www.google.com.au/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&q=scientific+method+definition&meta=&btnG=Google+Search" Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-50323563539255841642008-06-10T23:42:00.000+10:002008-06-10T23:42:00.000+10:00AGW (as a body of scientific literature) is a scie...AGW (as a body of scientific literature) is a science. You can only be one-eyed about it. <BR/><BR/>It's not a history, where multiple perspectives can give us balance.<BR/><BR/>It is not journalism, where you need both sides of the story.<BR/><BR/>It is a body of science. It is a number of overlapping fields.<BR/><BR/>And again you make<BR/><BR/>You know it is a science, because if it were a Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-43627173816917224922008-06-10T17:25:00.000+10:002008-06-10T17:25:00.000+10:00Wadard I "accuse" you of nothing but I do notice t...Wadard<BR/> I "accuse" you of nothing but I do notice that you are entirely one eyed on the AGW issue and apparently from your posts you exhibit no doubt at all that it is "all the fault of humanity". This is a faith position, not a scientific one.<BR/><BR/>You say you "know of science" but it seems that the fundamentals of the scientific method elude you when you write about AGW.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-35717045053209446592008-06-10T15:23:00.000+10:002008-06-10T15:23:00.000+10:00Thanks Damian, that 'ud be good.Ian Hall. I am not...Thanks Damian, that 'ud be good.<BR/><BR/>Ian Hall. I am not sure exactly what you are accusing me of, as you have not supported your assertion with any facts.<BR/><BR/>I know of science. I know nothing of Born again Christians, or even why the 'B' in 'Born' is capitalised, yet 'again' isn't. If you could assist me that would be great.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-80496330193171089792008-06-10T12:34:00.000+10:002008-06-10T12:34:00.000+10:00I think this is an important bit:"Lastly, environm...I think this is an important bit:<BR/><BR/>"Lastly, environmental sceptics often cast environmental protection as threatening Western progress."<BR/><BR/>That's certainly the approach underlying the "greenies want us to live in caves" line of argument favoured by many commentators in Australian media.<BR/><BR/>If you can access this article I'd like to read it in full. I'll see if I can locate itDamianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14088712667533193968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-31511493364277364982008-06-10T08:30:00.000+10:002008-06-10T08:30:00.000+10:00You certainly seem to be an AGW true believer, but...You certainly seem to be an AGW true believer, but I don't see one iota of original thought here, just an endless recycling of the conspiracy theories so beloved by followers of the green religion.<BR/>You even use the same tactics as Born again Christians do to answer their critics...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com