tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post114476919673306948..comments2023-12-31T14:37:54.685+11:00Comments on Global Warming Watch: Global warming denial funded by ExxonMobilWadardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-77109195147437689092011-11-26T23:51:57.127+11:002011-11-26T23:51:57.127+11:00It's great to see a blog of this quality. I le...It's great to see a blog of this quality. I learned a lot of new things and I'm looking forward to see more like this. Thank you.hcghttp://www.cheaphcgdiet.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1144906758949298182006-04-13T15:39:00.000+10:002006-04-13T15:39:00.000+10:00Glitch, with respect to your other link. I know yo...Glitch, with respect to your other link. I know you don't like me pointing out the connections of the scientific skeptics of global warming ... but too bad. The connection clearly has a bearing on what they say ... or there would be no connection. <BR/><BR/>So investigating the www.ExxonSecrets.org database reveals that the author of that opinion piece is indeed a oil-lobby shrill, being tied toWadardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1144906151477824592006-04-13T15:29:00.000+10:002006-04-13T15:29:00.000+10:00Glitch, yes - the past 300 years is what we should...Glitch, yes - the past 300 years is what we should be looking at, and we might want to look at the previous say 20,000 for a baseline. Since 1880's the temperature has gone up 1 degree celcius, and this also correlates with the 30% increase in atmospheric co2 since then.<BR/><BR/>Now there is no contention that atmospheric co2 has a heating effect when the sun's energy passes back though the Wadardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1144857584590404882006-04-13T01:59:00.000+10:002006-04-13T01:59:00.000+10:00hmmm....another interesting article:hmmm....<BR/><A HREF="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220" REL="nofollow"><BR/>another interesting article:<BR/></A>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15689387849773945835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1144857453167860712006-04-13T01:57:00.000+10:002006-04-13T01:57:00.000+10:00I dunno Wadard.... you're saying that the 'relevan...I dunno Wadard.... you're saying that the 'relevant' time span is the period of the Industrial/Post Industrial revolution.... the past 300 years? <BR/><BR/>I guess I'm still confused. Is there established proof that the earth's temps are warmer than they've ever been before? Has this even been established? Or are the 'indications' that the rate of the rate of increase is increasing over the Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15689387849773945835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1144856776662631212006-04-13T01:46:00.000+10:002006-04-13T01:46:00.000+10:00um, you can't 'have your cake and eat it too'."The...um, you can't 'have your cake and eat it too'.<BR/><BR/><I><BR/>"The past six million years is an irrelevant time span. Global climate concerns are not focused on the possibility that we might soon see the hottest temperatures in the history of Earth.</I><BR/><BR/>If the past 6 million years is irrelevant, and of course 8 years is irrelevant....doesn't that point out the weakness in your own Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15689387849773945835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1144852959439555792006-04-13T00:42:00.000+10:002006-04-13T00:42:00.000+10:00I thought the Skeptipundit link I gave did the job...I thought the Skeptipundit link I gave did the job quite elegantly:<BR/><BR/><I>"The past six million years is an irrelevant time span. Global climate concerns are not focused on the possibility that we might soon see the hottest temperatures in the history of Earth. The concern is that we will see human-caused (and thus potentially avoidable) warming of a magnitude that will be devastating to Wadardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1144841142695200672006-04-12T21:25:00.000+10:002006-04-12T21:25:00.000+10:00Hey Glitch, really now. If you are not going to re...Hey Glitch, really now. If you are not going to read it how can you comment?Wadardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1144838211004745192006-04-12T20:36:00.000+10:002006-04-12T20:36:00.000+10:00I STILL say 95% of temp variation is due to SOLAR ...I STILL say 95% of temp variation is due to SOLAR ACTIVITY. WHICH WE HAVE NO IMPACT ON! My 'carbon foot-print' has absolutely 0 impact. <BR/><BR/>(but again, still waiting for the evidence that will convince me your view is correct)<BR/><BR/>Hint: Use the actual arguments - don't use quotes of others as your 'evidence'.....<BR/><BR/>(of course, you know Glitch luvs you still, right? )<BR/><BRAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15689387849773945835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1144838002381541972006-04-12T20:33:00.000+10:002006-04-12T20:33:00.000+10:00uh, sorry - didn't read through all of it but, um,...uh, sorry - didn't read through all of it but, um, so the response is to trot out a bunch of other sources that say 'naughty naughty, we don't agree...' (then NOT produce any evidence other than they're comments?)....<BR/><BR/>Sorry chief, if you want folks (other than fellow kool-aid drinkers) to take you seriously<BR/><BR/>Just yelling louder that "THERE IS NOT DOUBT ABOUT OUR GLOBAL WARMING Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15689387849773945835noreply@blogger.com