I would have asked asked her to address the statement Dr. David Evans posed in last Friday’s The Australian
She might have asked you why you are relying on the views of someone who is just a computer programmer.
Evans was a “consultant” a the Australian Greenhouse Office, but not as an environmental expert (which he isn’t). He was merely writing a Windows desktop application for them.
Google cache will get you every time. What a
Now what I just is did is called argumentum ad hominem, and this is perfectly legitimate — but only when used against specific denialists, like AGW deniers.
On the other hand, Tim Lambert has chosen to reply to the argument itself, and the not attack the person making the argument.
Desmogblog clear the air: Evans is a self-promoting computer geek, not a science geek.
Technorati Tags: Global warming, climate change